http://sharkitecture.net Study Guide for the California Supplemental Exam Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:58:26 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/how-would-you-respond-if-an-employee-told-you-they-planned-to-moonlight-on-a-project-outside-your-office-2/ http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/how-would-you-respond-if-an-employee-told-you-they-planned-to-moonlight-on-a-project-outside-your-office-2/#comments Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:40:03 +0000 admin http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/how-would-you-respond-if-an-employee-told-you-they-planned-to-moonlight-on-a-project-outside-your-office-2/ I would discourage this activity as it has the potential to create liability as an employer, to reduce productivity, and to compete with my business entity. In no case may any office time or resources by used for moonlighting activities.

]]> http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/how-would-you-respond-if-an-employee-told-you-they-planned-to-moonlight-on-a-project-outside-your-office-2/feed/ 0 http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/an-unlicensed-member-of-your-staff-wants-to-use-company-resources-after-hours-to-provide-services-for-a-licensed-engineer-how-do-you-respond/ http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/an-unlicensed-member-of-your-staff-wants-to-use-company-resources-after-hours-to-provide-services-for-a-licensed-engineer-how-do-you-respond/#comments Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:10:59 +0000 admin http://sharkitecture.net/?p=188 Using company resources to moonlight is frowned upon. Also I’d point out that it is illegal to provide architectural services without a license; can only do work for a PE without a contract; (still need a license) my assisting him to do so would be in violation of the CAPA, because I was aiding someone violate the law.

]]> http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/an-unlicensed-member-of-your-staff-wants-to-use-company-resources-after-hours-to-provide-services-for-a-licensed-engineer-how-do-you-respond/feed/ 0