<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sharkitecture.NET &#187; CEQA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharkitecture.net/tag/ceqa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharkitecture.net</link>
	<description>Study Guide for the California Supplemental Exam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A project you have contracted is subject to CEQA.  What steps can you expect in the CEQA process and how do they impact the project?</title>
		<link>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/a-project-you-have-contracted-is-subject-to-ceqa-what-steps-can-you-expect-in-the-ceqa-process-and-how-do-they-impact-the-project-2/</link>
		<comments>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/a-project-you-have-contracted-is-subject-to-ceqa-what-steps-can-you-expect-in-the-ceqa-process-and-how-do-they-impact-the-project-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Study Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEQA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Impact Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkitecture.net/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a. The lead agency will examine project to see if it qualifies for a categorical or statutory exemption. If so they may issue a notice of exemption. b. If not exempt the lead agency performs an initial study to determine if the project will have any significant negative impacts on environmental quality. If no the lead agency will issue a negative declaration. The lead agency may also issue a negative declaration with mitigation measures. c. If the initial study indicates potential negative environmental impacts the lead agency will order an environmental impact report. This report will study the impacts in more detail and suggest mitigating measures if any to reduce the effects. Exemptions or Negative Declarations allow the project to move forward. Negative Declarations with Mitigation Measures requires changes to the project, but it moves forward. EIR requires significant project delay and potentially renders the project infeasible, significantly changes the project, or kills it entirely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a.    The lead agency will examine project to see if it qualifies for a categorical or statutory exemption.  If so they may issue a notice of exemption. </p>
<p>b.    If not exempt the lead agency performs an initial study to determine if the project will have any significant negative impacts on environmental quality.  If no the lead agency will issue a negative declaration.  The lead agency may also issue a negative declaration with mitigation measures.  </p>
<p>c.    If the initial study indicates potential negative environmental impacts the lead agency will order an environmental impact report.  This report will study the impacts in more detail and suggest mitigating measures if any to reduce the effects.  </p>
<p>Exemptions or Negative Declarations allow the project to move forward.  Negative Declarations with Mitigation Measures requires changes to the project, but it moves forward.  EIR requires significant project delay and potentially renders the project infeasible, significantly changes the project, or kills it entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/a-project-you-have-contracted-is-subject-to-ceqa-what-steps-can-you-expect-in-the-ceqa-process-and-how-do-they-impact-the-project-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You have been contracted to design a 20,000 sf sheriffâ€™s department in Monterey.</title>
		<link>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-20000-sf-sheriff%e2%80%99s-department-in-monterey/</link>
		<comments>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-20000-sf-sheriff%e2%80%99s-department-in-monterey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Study Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Coastal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Environmental Quality Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEQA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structural engineer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-20000-sf-sheriff%e2%80%99s-department-in-monterey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What agencies will have jurisdiction on this project? What consultants will be required on this project? What special provisions will a project of this type carry and how will that affect your scope and fee? For an essential services building such as this sheriffâ€™s station the DSA-SS would review structural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing provisions. The DSA-AC and the State Fire Marshall, would also have jurisdiction. As a coastal site, this project would be subject to the California Coastal Act and fall under the jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission. The project would most likely be subject to CEQA with the lead agency being the California Coastal Commission or local planning department. This project would require a geotechnical engineer, a structural engineer, mechanical electrical and plumbing engineers, telecomm, security, and potentially a traffic consultant. The additional work involved in an essential services building including periodic written reports to the enforcement agency would need to be factored into the fee to account for the extra time involved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What agencies will have jurisdiction on this project?  What consultants will be required on this project?  What special provisions will a project of this type carry and how will that affect your scope and fee?</strong></p>
<p>For an essential services building such as this sheriffâ€™s station the DSA-SS would review structural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing provisions.  The DSA-AC and the State Fire Marshall, would also have jurisdiction.  As a coastal site, this project would be subject to the California Coastal Act and fall under the jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission.  The project would most likely be subject to CEQA with the lead agency being the California Coastal Commission or local planning department.  This project would require a geotechnical engineer, a structural engineer, mechanical electrical and plumbing engineers, telecomm, security, and potentially a traffic consultant.  The additional work involved in an essential services building including periodic written reports to the enforcement agency would need to be factored into the fee to account for the extra time involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-20000-sf-sheriff%e2%80%99s-department-in-monterey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You have been contracted to design a 30,000 sf hospital adjacent to a river in Sacramento</title>
		<link>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-30000-sf-hospital-adjacent-to-a-river-in-sacramento/</link>
		<comments>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-30000-sf-hospital-adjacent-to-a-river-in-sacramento/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Study Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army Corps of Engineers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Department of Fish and Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Environmental Quality Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEQA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geotechnical engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkitecture.net/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What agencies will have jurisdiction on this project? What consultants will be required on this project? For a state-owned hospital the authorities having jurisdiction would include the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Developmentâ€™s Facility Development Division which would be the lead agency in the CEQA process. In addition, the State Fire Marshall, the DSA-AC would have jurisdiction as well as the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Department of Fish and Game and potentially the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as the Army Corps of Engineers may have jurisdiction, if it is a navigable water way. This project would require consultation with a licensed structural engineer, mechanical electrical and plumbing engineers, accessibility and barrier-free design consultant, geotechnical engineer and potentially a land-use attorney, cost-estimator, av consultant, wayfinding consultant and food service consultant, among others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What agencies will have jurisdiction on this project?  What consultants will be required on this project?</strong> </p>
<p>For a state-owned hospital the authorities having jurisdiction would include the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Developmentâ€™s Facility Development Division which would be the lead agency in the CEQA process.  In addition, the State Fire Marshall, the DSA-AC would have jurisdiction as well as the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Department of Fish and Game and potentially the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as the Army Corps of Engineers may have jurisdiction, if it is a navigable water way. This project would require consultation with a licensed structural engineer, mechanical electrical and plumbing engineers, accessibility and barrier-free design consultant, geotechnical engineer and potentially a land-use attorney, cost-estimator, av consultant, wayfinding consultant and food service consultant, among others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-30000-sf-hospital-adjacent-to-a-river-in-sacramento/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How would CEQA likely evaluate this project?</title>
		<link>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/how-would-ceqa-likely-evaluate-this-project/</link>
		<comments>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/how-would-ceqa-likely-evaluate-this-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Test Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Environmental Quality Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEQA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic Building]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkitecture.net/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Renovation of a Historic Building] Because there is no added square footage, or change to the environment created by the project, it would likely be exempt, or a negative declaration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Renovation of a Historic Building] Because there is no added square footage, or change to the environment created by the project, it would likely be exempt, or a negative declaration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/how-would-ceqa-likely-evaluate-this-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

