<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sharkitecture.NET &#187; Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharkitecture.net/tag/accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharkitecture.net</link>
	<description>Study Guide for the California Supplemental Exam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>You have been contracted to design a 30,000 sf nursing home, which is a project-type you do not have experience designing</title>
		<link>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-30000-sf-nursing-home-which-is-a-project-type-you-do-not-have-experience-designing/</link>
		<comments>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-30000-sf-nursing-home-which-is-a-project-type-you-do-not-have-experience-designing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Study Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrier-free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint venture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHPD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkitecture.net/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would you do to ensure your design is appropriate? I would consult with a qualified expert in accessibility and barrier-free design, and potentially form a joint-venture with another firm with experience in this project-type. I would consider adding staff with experience with this job type, researching similar projects, meeting with http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/ agency people early on to determine their process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What would you do to ensure your design is appropriate?</strong></p>
<p>I would consult with a qualified expert in accessibility and barrier-free design, and potentially form a joint-venture with another firm with experience in this project-type.  I would consider adding staff with experience with this job type, researching similar projects, meeting with http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/ agency people early on to determine their process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/you-have-been-contracted-to-design-a-30000-sf-nursing-home-which-is-a-project-type-you-do-not-have-experience-designing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Name 10 potential accessibility issues that are likely to arise (historic building)</title>
		<link>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/name-10-potential-accessibility-issues-that-are-likely-to-arise-historic-building/</link>
		<comments>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/name-10-potential-accessibility-issues-that-are-likely-to-arise-historic-building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Test Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elevator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic Fire House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkitecture.net/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. elevator access 2. bathroom accessories (grab bars, mounting heights) 3. ramps to front entry, if stairs are present 4. signage 5. clearances at doors and in restrooms 6. strobe lights 7. accessible countertop heights 8. door thresholds 9. door hardware (levers, kickplates, closers) 10. contrasting stripes on stair treads a) Restrooms dimensions b) Corridor width c) Width of doors d) clearances at doors e) means of access and egress f) ht. of door knobs g) ht., location and clearance around of water fountains h) Projection from the ceiling i) Clearance in the lounge j) Ht. of the kitchen counter in the lounge]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. elevator access<br />
2. bathroom accessories (grab bars, mounting heights)<br />
3. ramps to front entry, if stairs are present<br />
4. signage<br />
5. clearances at doors and in restrooms<br />
6. strobe lights<br />
7. accessible countertop heights<br />
8. door thresholds<br />
9. door hardware (levers, kickplates, closers)<br />
10. contrasting stripes on stair treads</p>
<p>a)   Restrooms  dimensions<br />
b)   Corridor width<br />
c)   Width of doors<br />
d)   clearances at doors<br />
e)   means of access and egress<br />
f)    ht. of door knobs<br />
g)   ht., location and clearance around of water fountains<br />
h)   Projection from the ceiling<br />
i)    Clearance in the lounge<br />
j)    Ht. of the kitchen counter in the lounge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/name-10-potential-accessibility-issues-that-are-likely-to-arise-historic-building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assess and apply specific provisions of relevant laws, codes, regulations, and standards review and approval processes</title>
		<link>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/assess-and-apply-specific-provisions-of-relevant-laws-codes-regulations-and-standards-review-and-approval-processes/</link>
		<comments>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/assess-and-apply-specific-provisions-of-relevant-laws-codes-regulations-and-standards-review-and-approval-processes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharkitecture.net/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Review and approval 2. Plan check â€“ generally will check for code compliance to fire and life safety requirements, accessibility, and other local regulations 3. Design review 4. Environmental Review (see below)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.	Review and approval</p>
<p>2.	Plan check â€“ generally will check for code compliance to fire and life safety requirements, accessibility, and other local regulations</p>
<p>3.	Design review</p>
<p>4.	Environmental Review (see below)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sharkitecture.net/2009/01/assess-and-apply-specific-provisions-of-relevant-laws-codes-regulations-and-standards-review-and-approval-processes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

