Comments on: a client has signed off on a SD set and a DD set, but during CD’s the client discovers a space adjacency that was approved in PD is not being accounted for in the design, is the architect obligated to make this change without further compensation or is it fair to say the client should have caught this prior to signing off on the SD and DD drawings?

Comments on: a client has signed off on a SD set and a DD set, but during CD’s the client discovers a space adjacency that was approved in PD is not being accounted for in the design, is the architect obligated to make this change without further compensation or is it fair to say the client should have caught this prior to signing off on the SD and DD drawings? http://sharkitecture.net/2009/05/a-client-has-signed-off-on-a-sd-set-and-a-dd-set-but-during-cds-the-client-discovers-a-space-adjacency-that-was-approved-in-pd-is-not-being-accounted-for-in-the-design-is-the-architect-obligated-t/ What every Architect should know Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:44:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1